FTNI
Discover
Pivotal Payments
Spectra
Wnet
RDC Summit
WSAA
Wausau
September 2, 2010


News
Current Issue
Subscribe
Advertise
Archive
About Us
Contact Us
Calendar
Buyers Guide
Web Transaction
Performance Indexes
NEW! Data on outage hours

MSI
The Recession Is Sending Rates of Friendly Fraud Up, Processors Say

(January 28, 2009) With the recession throwing more and more people out of work by the day, payments processors are reporting that their merchants are experiencing sharp increases in e-commerce chargebacks stemming from so-called friendly fraud. This is the fraud that results when a consumer repudiates a transaction as unauthorized in hopes of escaping liability for payment.

First Atlantic Commerce Ltd., an e-commerce transaction gateway in Bermuda that serves sellers of digital content, said this week that its merchants have seen a steady rise in chargebacks related to such repudiation since October, when the U.S. economy, already weak, took a decided turn for the worse. Andrea Wilson, chief executive of FAC, tells Digital Transactions News by e-mail that the combination of rising chargebacks and falling sales volumes is pushing more merchants above the allowable thresholds the card networks set for chargebacks as a proportion of card volume. “Banks that never had merchants on the global chargeback monitoring program are now getting notification from Visa and MasterCard,” she says. Merchants, she adds, “are being fined for a situation they have absolutely no control over.”

Merchants that exceed these chargeback thresholds are asked to present a plan to bring their chargebacks down within a certain period of time. Failure to control chargebacks can result in fines for acquirers, which pass them on to merchants.

The friendly fraud problem appears to be especially acute for merchants that traffic in games, music, and other digital downloads. Proof of delivery in such sales can be hard to establish, making it difficult to defend against a chargeback, and making it all the more tempting for strapped consumers to repudiate a purchase. The problem becomes even more acute given the typical lag time between the date of a transaction and when the statement arrives. During this time, a buyer in recent months may have been more likely to have lost a job, suffered a pay reduction, or seen an investment position wiped out.

Vindicia Inc., an e-commerce processor in Redwood City, Calif.., that specializes in handling transactions for digital goods, says it too has seen a larger-than-usual bulge in friendly fraud recently. Such increases are not unusual in the weeks before and after the holidays as some consumers repudiate transactions in an effort to free up credit lines for more purchases, says Sanjay Sarathy, senior vice president of marketing at Vindicia. But the recent jump, he says, has been exceptional. While the problem is hard to quantify, “we believe the economic recession has exacerbated this trend and we are starting to see that with some of our merchants whose friendly fraud volume is above normal,” he tells Digital Transactions News.

Vindicia is only starting to see this trend now because it can take as many as 90 days to challenge a chargeback, get it investigated, and get a result indicating whether it stemmed from real fraud or a case of a customer getting cold feet. Overall, online merchants challenged half of all fraud-coded chargebacks in 2008, up from 47% in 2007, according to research conducted by CyberSource Inc., a Mountain View, Calif.-based payments-gateway and risk-management provider. Of the chargebacks they represented last year, merchants won 44%, CyberSource says.

While that may seem encouraging, some processors argue merchants should do more to protect themselves against friendly fraud now that signs indicate the recession isn’t likely to lift any time soon. FAC’s Wilson, for example, urges merchants to adopt the online authentication systems created by Visa and MasterCard. These technologies, called Verified by Visa and SecureCode, ask the consumer to authenticate himself at checkout by entering a secret code presumably known only to him. Under rules that differ somewhat between the two networks, merchants that adopt the authentication systems can be protected against liability for chargebacks.

Some 27% of online merchants surveyed last fall by CyberSource were using one or the other of these authentication technologies, with 18% indicating they planned to implement it.







Credit Unions Outpace Banks in Imaging ATMs
Countering the perception that they’re not as tech-savvy as their banking brethren, credit unions...

VeriFone’s Way Systems Deal Bolsters Its Strategy
With its acquisition of mobile-terminal maker Way Systems Inc., VeriFone Systems Inc. picked up a...

Gift Cards, Having Gone Virtual, Now Are Going Mobile
First gift cards went virtual, and now they’re going mobile. Portland, Ore.-based Giftango Corp....

BankServ Snaps up NetDeposit, Bulks Up in Remote Capture
Already a force in remote deposit capture and specialty deposit and payment services, privately...

Broadband, Smart Phones Drive Torrid Growth for Content
While banks, card networks, and wireless carriers jockey for position in the nascent market for...

With CertiFlash, Star Is First EFT Network to Offer Contactless
First Data Corp.’s Star Network introduced on Wednesday technology that represents the first...

Deluged with Requests, Fiserv Rolls out a Mobile Capture Service
With the nation’s largest bank processor on board, mobile remote deposit capture seems likely to...

Visa Guidance Targets Slipshod Payment Card Software Practices
Recognizing that sloppy payment-processing software installations can lead to data breaches, Visa...


Copyright 2010 by Boland Hill Media LLC. All the text, graphics, audio, design, software, and other works are
the copyrighted works of Boland Hill Media LLC. All rights reserved. Any redistribution or reproduction of any
materials herein is strictly prohibited.
Privacy policy